What is paludiculture?

This section is under development and content will evolve when I get a chance. If you want more information or have any suggestions to help the development of the content the contact us at paludiculture@niab.com

Paludiculture is the productive use of wet and rewetted peatlands, where farming systems are designed to operate with high water tables rather than relying on drainage. The term comes from the Latin palus (swamp) and cultura (cultivation), reflecting the active management of wet soils for agricultural production.

In practice, paludiculture involves growing crops that are naturally adapted to wet conditions—such as reed, Typha (bulrush), Sphagnum moss, wet grasslands, or tree species—while maintaining peat‑preserving hydrology. This approach allows land to remain productive while dramatically reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to conventional drained peatland agriculture.

Why Peatlands Matter (The Science)

Peat Soils and Carbon Storage

Peat soils are formed from partially decomposed plant material that accumulates under waterlogged, oxygen‑poor conditions. Since the decomposition is slow, peatlands act as major long‑term carbon stores and although peatlands cover a relatively small proportion of the UK’s land area, they contain disproportionately large amounts of soil carbon.

When peat soils are drained for agriculture, oxygen enters the soil profile and the peat begins to oxidise. This process converts stored soil carbon into carbon dioxide (CO₂), releasing it into the atmosphere. In England, emissions from drained agricultural peatlands are estimated at around 8.5 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent per year, making them a significant source of national greenhouse gas emissions.

How Paludiculture Reduces Emissions

Water Table Control and Peat Preservation

Adapted harvester for harvesting bulrush seed heads, Somerset.

The key scientific principle behind paludiculture is hydrological control. By raising and stabilising the water table—typically to around 20 cm below the soil surface or higher—oxygen availability in the peat is reduced. This slows microbial decomposition and significantly reduces carbon losses from the soil.

Unlike peatland restoration, where productivity is not the primary goal, paludiculture systems are explicitly managed to:

Maintain high water tables
Optimise above‑ground biomass production
Allow regular harvesting without damaging peat structure

This combination makes paludiculture a climate‑mitigation land use rather than simply a conservation measure.

Paludiculture vs Conventional Peatland Farming

Drainage‑Based Agriculture

Traditional farming on peat soils depends on:

Artificial drainage
Regular pumping
Ongoing peat loss through oxidation and subsidence

Over time, this leads to declining soil depth, increasing flood risk, and rising costs to maintain drainage infrastructure.

It must be remembered that peatland farming is economically significant with this land is used for high‑value crops. The estimated annual value of arable and horticultural production on lowland peat soils in the UK, is approimately £3 billion per year, including:

Vegetables (salad crops, brassicas, onions, carrots)
Potatoes - although there is a gradual transition away from growing potatoes on peat
Sugar beet - phasing down sugar beet growing on peat over time
Some cereals

Vegetable crops dominate the economic value:

The East Anglian Fens alone produce ~40% of England’s vegetables, much of it on peat soils
Nationally, lowland peat supports a disproportionately large share of the UK’s fresh vegetable production, despite covering a small land area.

Estimated farm‑gate value of Fenland lettuce: £40–50 million per year

Estimated value of celery production on peat soils: £15–20 million per year

Paludiculture Systems

Paludiculture reverses this model by:

Designing farming systems around wet conditions
Selecting crops that tolerate or require high water tables
Embedding environmental outcomes (carbon reduction, water regulation) into system design

Since peatlands are hydrologically connected, changes must be planned with Internal Drainage Boards/authorities and neighbouring land managers to avoid off‑site impacts (e.g., flooding adjacent land). Hydrological feasibility studies and modelling are often required before implementation. Learn more on this here - Link to come, the pages are still under development if you would like to know more then please contact us at paludiculture@niab.com.

Matching crops to hydrology

Crop choice is a water‑management decision. Species such as Typha (cattail), Phragmites (reed), Carex (sedges), willow, and farmed Sphagnum are adapted to saturated conditions.
Experimental evidence shows productivity and biomass quality respond to water‑table depth and nutrients, and that different species perform best at different depths (e.g., Typha species differing in optimal water levels).
Long‑term studies indicate that high water levels support peat formation potential even under productive use, especially where nutrients are managed.

Water quality and nutrients

Willow production, Coates Willow Somerset

Rewetting peat reduces nutrient mineralisation and leaching compared with the drained peat; wet systems can act as nutrient sinks, improving downstream water quality.
Paludiculture crops can remove nitrogen and phosphorus from water, particularly under controlled nutrient loading, providing a water‑treatment co‑benefit.
Nutrient legacies from historical drainage may persist after rewetting; water management and crop selection are used to steer nutrients into biomass rather than losses.

Seasonal dynamics and operations

Seasonality matters: winter water levels are often kept highest to protect peat and store floodwater; summer levels may be modestly lowered (within safe ranges) to facilitate establishment or harvest, depending on crop and machinery.
Harvest timing and methods must align with wet conditions (e.g., winter cutting on frozen or very wet soils, amphibious machinery) to avoid compaction and peat damage.

Risks and trade‑offs to manage

Flood risk redistribution: raising water locally can increase levels elsewhere if not coordinated at catchment scale.
Biodiversity interactions: high water tables generally benefit wetland species, but uniform depths can reduce habitat heterogeneity—hence the value of zonation.
Transition costs and governance: capital works, permissions, and ongoing management are non‑trivial and require long‑term agreements

Practical takeaways

Set clear water‑table targets tied to crops and outcomes (GHG, water quality, biodiversity).
Use adjustable structures to cope with weather variability.
Plan at catchment scale, not field by field.
Monitor water levels, nutrients, and vegetation to adapt management over time.

Sign up for our newsletter